The politically driven revision of electronic payment transactions prompts action in the German payment market: national payment procedures increasingly compete against international payment services and new, contactless payment options. Having said that, the Girocard, direct debits, and cash won’t become obsolete models anytime soon.
International payment systems are one of the major trends in the payment market. Yet the payment preferences and reservations of customers even within Europe are so varied to where retailers quickly reach feasible limits of profitability. What’s more, eliminating cash entirely is an internationally heated debate but is presently more likely to be theoretical in nature – just in Germany alone, 80 percent of retail transactions are still paid for in cash. However, as a percentage of sales, cash only makes up 50 percent at this point, continuing a downward trend. At the same time, mobile payment solutions are internationally waiting in the wings but this trend is still in its infancy in Germany.
The fundamental factors based on current developments:
There are currently two developments that preoccupy the world of payment systems: the commencement of the European Interchange Regulation (Multilateral Interchange Fee – MIF), also referred to as the “Interbankentgelt“ by Germany’s 4-party system as well as the end of comprehensive merchant fees for Girocard payments by the German Banking Industry Committee (Deutsche Kreditwirtschaft), DK. MIF caps fees at 0.3 percent of sales, which is designed to make payments with debit and credit cards online or in brick-and-mortar stores considerably more attractive for retailers.
This is also the objective of the abolition of the standard merchant service fee charged since 1989, which according to plans by the German Federal Cartel Office (“Bundeskartellamt”), is meant to be negotiated between the retail sector and the German Banking Industry Committee in the future. Whether this will actually result in benefits is somewhat doubtful: the German Retail Federation (HDE) criticized that especially small and medium-sized enterprises are often not able to negotiate individual contracts with all payment service providers and are therefore dependent on the so-called negotiating “concentrators“.
Since the proposed retailer concentrator model by the German Banking Industry Committee has so far not yielded the expected improvements in terms and conditions – quite the contrary, the processes became increasingly complex – competition against the Girocard has so far not materialized. Ironically, the electronic direct debit payment method (ELV) is currently enjoying a comeback in Germany thanks to the self-inflicted uncertainties – several retail companies have already changed over to an EC cash/ELV combined system.
The most frequently used payment method on an international basis is the credit card – though there are also some notable distinctions: while Visa and MasterCard dominate the European market, customers in the U.S. also use American Express cards. Things are yet again very different in Asia. One aspect that’s noteworthy today: purchasing on credit is becoming more and more attractive, especially for international companies since credit cards are no longer only accepted at gas stations and on the Internet but also increasingly at retail store checkouts.
This also provides credit card companies with opportunities – despite the EU fee cuts, they are able to make more money in the long run thanks to increased credit card prevalence and use. Europe has made an important step towards a continental standardization with the SEPA direct debit system; SEPA is also increasingly accepted by customers outside of Germany.
Since payment methods are also strongly driven by national preferences, the newfound freedom to use various types of payment methods still does not have the invigorating effects on the payment market in Germany that it could have: there are several cashless payment methods that dominate the market such as credit cards and PayPal for instance. Aside from the big players and the respective national methods of payment, it is very difficult for providers of new payment systems to gain traction. After all, two things are required for this: on the one hand, retailers need to offer a new payment procedure, while consumers need to use it on the other hand.
The successful launch of a new payment method, therefore, requires a critical mass on both sides. The rule of thumb, however, is: the simpler and more secure a payment system is to use, the greater its market power becomes – which is evident by the success of credit cards and PayPal which are both convenient to use and very secure unlike other payment methods – notwithstanding data privacy concerns.
That’s why the fundamental question retailers need to ask is: which payment method is the easiest to use? NFC technology, that being contactless payments at the point of sale with your own smartphone, has so far not been utilized enough. That’s why when it comes to customer retention, more and more service providers emphasize their own smartphone apps that offer more service and additional benefits for consumers. The drawback: paying through apps requires the input of sensitive data and account information that is often resold and can be used by third parties without any regulations.
Unlike PayPal or various app choices, paydirekt enables users to pay via online banking – the payment is then directly processed between the retailer and the customer’s bank, while the data is processed in Germany – without detours via any interim accounts or intermediary service providers. The checkout process is simple: payments are triggered by entering your email address and password. Compared to PayPal or various other app choices, information about purchases is not meant to be resold. This may work out for German consumers since data privacy and trust are fundamental pillars of paying German-style.
Now this begs the question of whether paydirekt will be able to take hold in the market. Once the critical mass on the part of customers has been reached, one can assume that retailers will increasingly incorporate the payment method thanks to its lower costs. However, so far online retail does not have a model available that regulates joint terms and conditions between banks and paydirekt. Small and medium-sized enterprises, in particular, are not able to individually negotiate terms and conditions with every bank – this requires experienced payment service providers who process payments for retailers and connect them. There are many choices: before making their selection, retailers should make sure that payment service providers offer a complete payment solution that also integrates the new payment procedures into customer-oriented order and service processes. Payment service providers assume an important intermediary role as the link between customers and online retailers.
Author: Mirko Hüllemann, CEO of Heidelberger Payment GmbH